|
|
|
Why Skeptical Comments were Censored for at Time on the PES_MXLO Discussion List
From: Sterling
D. Allan
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 7:15 AM
Subject: Why Skeptical Comments were Censored for at
Time on the PES_MXLO Discussion List
Thomas,
You misrepresent the situation.
First of all, there was a time when skeptical comments were being allowed on
the pes_mxlo list, and just about every negative point was made that could be
made -- several times. The skeptical point of view was made ad nauseum.
Those are still available for review by list members, and some of them were
permanently archived and indexed from the site.
It was creating a vicious cycle of negativity, and we decided to say in
essence, "Okay, we know that these negative possibilities exist. We
choose to just focus on the productive comments that will enable us to pursue
this project and arrive at a working unit is such is possible."
We pursued per the instructions from MXLO, and we proved that their plans are
not adequate, not clear, and that it is highly probable that no such working
device exists at all -- and that if it does, it is so hard to obtain that it
doesn't make a replication let alone a manufacturing project feasible.
After fourteen known replications and no working devices, the group pretty
well decided that the jig was up. Only one or two die-hards continued,
and I've not heard any reports of progress from them. I don't know of
anyone working on this design at present.
Had the negative comments prevailed, we would not have arrived at such a
decisive answer that PROVED something with tangible evidence, rather than just
basing it on educated opinion, as you were.
It turns out that yes, you were right, but we proved that you were right, with
empirical evidence; and what we now have is a website that documents the
disproving of the MXLO to a profound significant extent.
MXLO has folded, and now redirects their site to the U.S. government's
"renewable energy" website.
Sincerely,
Sterling D. Allan
--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, ranger116@w... wrote: > Yes Mr Allan should be allowed to post > Unlike when he censored me, Because I saw through the MEX-PEXLO free > energy device as a phony and then several list members wasted their > time, money and enthusiasm trying to make it work. See also
Posted by SDA
June 22, 2004 |
|
|
www.PureEnergySystems.com |
